Cwmllwyd Moths 1997 – 2013.
In
his highly readable and informative Newsletter for Spring 2014, Ian
inserted some notes on moth records from Cwmllwyd that had been
collected over the past several years. I hope that the following
comments may be considered pertinent.
Ian
is quite right to be wary of unsubstantiated records; the County
database could be compromised and rendered valueless without such
vigilance. No-one wants a reprise of the type of problems that Jon
had in sorting out the Rothamsted data. So I agree with the need for
careful and informed scrutiny and I am able to receive criticism of
Cwmllwyd records with a degree of equanimity. It was not my
assumption when submitting those records that all, or any of them,
would be accepted as appropriate additions to the county list. After
all, my data recording (for example) has not conformed with methods
that are useful to Recorders here and my records were made for my own
interest, rather than for public consumption. I would be mortified if
anyone thought that these records were the moth equivalent of the
“Hastings rarities!” I am sure that they contain mistakes, but at
the same time, there are some cracking moths up here on the side of
the mountain.
Since
making contact with the Carmarthenshire group last autumn, I have
been provided with a new and invaluable tool to assist identification
by highlighting species which are unlikely to be present. I
refer, of course, to Jon's 2006 Annual Report, without which, you can
be sure, there would be far more errors from Cwmllwyd in years to
come! I have also acquired a decent camera, so an increasing number
of record shots of dubious quality should be forthcoming.
Ian's
review of Cwmllwyd data drew out several species that were doubtful,
or required photographic evidence. These include the following:
Dwarf
Cream Wave, Peacock, Pale November Moth, Haworth's Minor and, quite
possibly, several other species, are all most likely to have been
misidentified; mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima
culpa!
The Streamer 3 April 2014
Steve
Clarke.
Welcome to the blogsite Steve - and thanks for the informative contribution. Obviously, you`ve now `mastered the knack` of using the site! Interesting comment too re the oak/northern eggar.
ReplyDeleteWe look forward to more of your 2014 records in due course.
On another and unrelated matter, I have traced some details (as manuscript notes) of TW Barker`s natural history records (including, hopefully, some moths) made at Cwmffrwd at the junction of the 19th and 20th Centuries.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Steve, thanks for your thoughts. For what it's worth, I'm sure your Eggars are plausible having chased them around the Blorenge in VC35 a few years ago. You are also about as well placed as anyone in the county to get Peacock and Haworth's Minor, so I suspect only mea minora cupla! I'm looking forward to photographic evidence to back up these species and others in 2014.
ReplyDelete